# How do you work out logarithm tables

In 1614 (yes 1614) John Napier produced a work of natural logarithm tables. The paper contained ninety pages of tables and fifty seven pages of explanatory notes.

This took him 20 years to create.

Then Henry Briggs changed these original logarithms into a common (base 10) logarithm. The method John Napier used was extraordinarily long winded.

## Can we find any logarithms ourselves without Napier?

Because logs are in reverse it’s actually easier to find some anti logarithm numbers using iteration.

## Logs – Napier – Briggs

To remember the connection between these people think of the following picture:

**The log** took a **nap here** (Napier) on the **bridge** (Briggs).

Logs – Nappier – Briggs

**Example 1**

We know `9^0.5=9^(1/2)=root(2)(9)`

Which all really mean that:

What can you multiply twice to get `9`

(the answer is `3` (i.e. `3xx3=9`))

Using the same logic then

`10^0.1=10^(1/10)=root(10)(10)`

and this means that:

What can you multiply ten times to get `10` ?

We can attempt to find this by trying different values. Try multiplying `1.2` ten times and see if we get close to a value of `10`.

If that doesn't work, add a bit on and try `1.3` as follows.

What do we have to multiply by itself ten times to get `10` ?

But this is very long winded.

**NOTE:**

Using anti log tables for `10^0.1` anti log of `0.1 = 1.259`

**Example 2 **

Now that we know that `10^(1/10)=1.259`

To work out the anti log of each of the following:

`10^0.2`, `10^0.3`, `10^0.4`, `10^0.5`, `10^0.6`, `10^0.7`, `10^0.8` and `10^0.9`

Is easy because we can turn these all into fractions `10^0.2 = 10^(2/10)`

`10^0.2 = (10sqrt10)^2`

Which means what do we multiply by itself `10` times to get `10` (we know this equals `1.259`) and then multiply this answer 2 times i.e. `1.259\times 1.259 =`

`1.259\times 1.259 =1.585`

and as a double check the anti log tables of

`10^0.2` - anti log of `0.2 = 1.585`

So as follows the rest would be

# How do you work out logarithm tables

In 1614 (yes 1614) John Napier produced a work of natural logarithm tables. The paper contained ninety pages of tables and fifty seven pages of explanatory notes.

This took him 20 years to create.

Then Henry Briggs changed these original logarithms into a common (base 10) logarithm. The method John Napier used was extraordinarily long winded.

## Can we find any logarithms ourselves without Napier?

Because logs are in reverse it’s actually easier to find some anti logarithm numbers using iteration.

## Logs – Napier – Briggs

To remember the connection between these people think of the following picture:

**The log** took a **nap here** (Nappier) on the **bridge** (Briggs).

Logs – Napier – Briggs

**Example 1**

`10^0.1` can be expressed as a fraction

`10^0.1=10^(1/10)`

And this equals `root(10)(10)`

What do we have to multiply by itself ten times to get `10`?

But this is very long winded.

**NOTE:**

Using anti log tables for `10^0.1` anti log of `0.1 = 1.259`

**Example 2 **

Now that we know that `10^(1/10)=1.259`

To work out the anti log of each of the following:

`10^0.2`, `10^0.3`, `10^0.4`, `10^0.5`, `10^0.6`, `10^0.7`, `10^0.8` and `10^0.9`

Is easy because we can turn these all into fractions `10^0.2 = 10^(2/10)`

`10^0.2 = (10sqrt10)^2`

Which means what do we multiply by itself `10` times to get `10` (we know this equals `1.259`) and then multiply this answer 2 times i.e. `1.259\times 1.259 =`

`1.259\times 1.259 =1.585`

and as a double check the anti log tables of

`10^0.2` - anti log of `0.2 = 1.585`

So as follows the rest would be